🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.